FDA Decision on BPA Outrages Health Advocates
Scientific studies ignored on bisphenol A evaluation
For Immediate Release: August 20, 2008
Contact: Stephenie Hendricks, (415) 258-9151, firstname.lastname@example.org
SAN FRANCISCO – A broad spectrum of scientists, physicians, and children's health advocates expressed outrage with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) announcement that bisphenol A – the hormone disrupting chemical found in numerous consumer products including food can linings and plastic baby bottles – is "safe." In laboratory studies, the pervasive chemical has been linked to obesity, developmental problems, diabetes, risk for heart attack, and several types of cancers including breast and prostate cancer.
"The FDA's draft assessment relies on just two studies which were funded by the American Chemistry Council (ACC), Dow Chemical, Bayer and other plastics manufacturers. Not only does this assessment ignore the dozens of other studies done by independent scientists which have found evidence of health consequences, but FDA's conclusions are in direct conflict with two National Institutes of Health reviews and the actions of its counterpart in Canada," says Dr. Sarah Janssen, a physician and scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
"The chemical industry's efforts to hide or misrepresent the hazards of their product have been so over the top that even Congress has felt the need to intervene," said Dr. Jennifer Sass, a scientist with the NRDC. Congress is now scrutinizing the communications between the ACC and a PR firm called the Weinberg Group whose clients have included the alcohol and tobacco industries.
Earlier this year, Congressman John Dingell (D-MI) said, "There are serious health concerns about whether bisphenol A is safe, not only for adults, but for children and infants. The tactics apparently employed by the Weinberg Group raise serious questions about whether science is for sale at these consulting groups, and the effect this faulty science might have on the public health."
Congressman Edward J. Markey (D-MA), senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee says, "The FDA assessment stands in stark contrast to dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers that have found real health risks associated with exposure to BPA. On issue after issue, the Bush Administration casts aside concerns about public health and consumer protection in favor of commercial interests that benefit corporate America. Over the past eight years, the Bush Administration’s mantra has been 'In industry we trust.' Since the regulators are asleep at the wheel, I’ve introduced legislation to ban BPA in all food and beverage containers, and will continue to work to ensure that it is enacted into law."
Union of Concerned Scientists conducted a poll with FDA scientists that indicated, in general, broad industry interference within the agency, and documented intimidation of scientists who may not have agreed with industry promoted decisions at the agency.
"The FDA is bowing to the chemical industry's influence, and trying to convince the American public that this chemical is OK. There is clear and credible evidence, and more scientific studies, showing links to the very health effects we see on the rise today," says Christopher Gavigan, executive director of Healthy Child, Healthy World.
Many observers are seeing parallels between the tobacco industry's use of PR firms and hired experts to deceive the American public about harm from smoking and what is going on with the chemical industry today.
"The profits keep growing for Dow Chemical, General Electric, and other chemical and petrochemical companies in the American Chemistry Council that make bisphenol A," says Mia Davis with the Workgroup for Safe Markets. "We're demanding that our public health be held in higher importance than the wealth of these corporations."
"Scientists, parents and public health advocates agree," said Janet Nudelman, Director of Program and Policy for the Breast Cancer Fund, "There is more than enough science to be concerned about exposure to even exquisitely small amounts of BPA."
"It is unbelievable to me that thirty years after toxic contamination was causing harm to 900 families at Love Canal and both state and federal governments only acted after the community forced their hands, that we see today the same unacceptable inaction by our federal government. When will government learn to err on the side of caution instead of risk equations?" said Lois Gibbs, founder and executive director of the Center for Health, Environment and Justice.
"A baby bottle that contains chemicals which may cause obesity, developmental problems, diabetes or cancer is hardly 'safe,'" said Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, Executive Director of MomsRising.org. "When people buy products for their children, they expect those products to be free of cancer-causing agents and other toxins. For the FDA to undermine that belief by labeling as safe products containing chemicals that can cause serious damage to growing kids is unconscionable and a complete abdication of their responsibility to the American public."
# # #
Available for Interviews
Sarah Janssen, MD, PhD, MPH is a science fellow in the Health and Environment program at Natural Resources Defense Council 415.875.6126 email@example.com
Jennifer Sass, PhD, senior scientist, Natural Resource Defense Council 202.289.6868 firstname.lastname@example.org
Anila Jacobs, MD, senior scientist with Environmental Working Group. To schedule an interview with Anila, contact Alex Formuzis 202.939.9140
Janet Nudelman, Director of Program and Policy for the Breast Cancer Fund. To schedule an interview with Janet Nudelman, please contact Shannon Coughlin, 415.336.2246, email@example.com
Mia Davis, Co-Coordinator, Workgroup for Safe Markets 617.338.8131 ext 201 firstname.lastname@example.org
Kathleen A. Curtis, Policy Director, Clean New York, a project of Women's Voices for the Earth 518 6698282 (cell) 518 355.6202 (home office) http://www.clean-ny.org email@example.com
Sarah Uhl, Coordinator of the Coalition for a Safe & Healthy Connecticut 860.232.6232 (office) / 860.882.9950 (cell) firstname.lastname@example.org
Jane Haley-Harris, Executive Director of the Oregon Center for Environmental Health 503.233.1510 email@example.com
Lindsay Dahl, Healthy Legacy Minnesota 612.870.3458 www.healthylegacy.org firstname.lastname@example.org
Christopher Gavigan, CEO / Executive Director, Healthy Child Healthy World 310.820.2030 www.healthychild.org
Lois Gibbs, founder, Center for Health Environment and Justice. To schedule an interview with Lois, contact Dianna Wentz 703.237.2249, ext. 19 412.512.3208 (cell) email@example.com
Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, Executive Director, MomsRising.org. For interviews contact Gretchen Wright 202.371.1999
- Union of Concerned Scientists FDA Scientists Survey
- House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Dingell, Stupak Investigate American Chemistry Council
- House Committee on Government Oversight Letters Regarding BPA
- Center for Health, Environment and Justice
- Is It In Us? Biomonitoring study shows BPA contamination in the bodies of 35 people nationwide
- Bisphenol A and Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Fund